Comparison Of Peening Effect Between Additive Manufacutred And Drawing Titanium Alloy
Author: Hitoshi Soyama
Source: ICSP-15
Doc ID: 2026042
Year of Publication: 2026
Abstract:
Although additively manufactured (AM) metals are attractive materials, their remarkable weak
fatigue properties are an obstacle to their practical application. Thus, post-processing to
improve their fatigue properties is required. In the present study, powder bed fusion using
laser sintering titanium alloy, i.e., PBF-LS/Ti6Al4V was treated by shot peening (SP),
submerged laser peening (SLP), cavitation peening (CP), and fine particle bombarding (FPB),
then the fatigue properties were investigated by a torsional fatigue test, comparing with
drawing Ti6Al4V. It was revealed that the fatigue strength at 107 was 446 ± 5 MPa for PBFLS/
Ti6Al4V treated by FPB+CP, 359 ± 9 MPa for LS/Ti6Al4V treated by SLP and 457 ± 22
MPa for drawing Ti6Al4V treated by SLP, whereas it was 210 ± 10 MPa for as-built (AB) PBFLS/
Ti6Al4V and 346 ± 26 MPa for non-peened drawing Ti6Al4V. Namely, the fatigue strength
of PBF-LS/Ti6Al4V treated by FPB+CP exceeded that of non-peened (NP) drawing Ti6Al4V.
| Download PDF |
|---|
| For more information: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1018&context=icsp15 |
|---|